我的征尘是星辰大海。。。

The dirt and dust from my pilgrimage forms oceans of stars...

-------当记忆的篇章变得零碎，当追忆的图片变得模糊，我们只能求助于数字存储的永恒的回忆

作者:黄教授

手机视频列表

江西博物馆二元大车奇遇

视频

音频

原始脚本

江西博物馆2元打车奇遇，揭秘网约车地下地推链，看懂互联网烧钱真相。
上周在江西博物馆，我经历了一件至今回想起来都觉得不可思议的事。
也彻底看清了当下网约车行业，乃至整个中国互联网圈藏在流量背后的残酷商业逻辑。
原本以为是骗局，最后全程安全落地。
可越琢磨越觉得，这看似占便宜的小事，实则是一场资本、地推、普通用户三方交织的精准博弈。
今天把完整经历和背后深层逻辑全部分享给大家。
帮外行人一眼看透门道。
从江西博物馆参观结束后，我打算前往地铁站。
刚走到馆门口，就被一群看似拉客的人围了上来。
不同于寻常黑车拉客，他们开口就说两块钱帮你打正规出租车、网约车到地铁站。
第一反应就是难以置信，甚至满心警惕。
这段路程虽说不远，大概一公里左右。
可就算是摩的、三轮车，两块钱也根本不可能。
更何况是正规出租车、网约车。
正常打车即便起步价也远不止这个数。
摆明了不符合常理，任谁都会觉得是骗局，要么是中途加价，要么是诱导消费。
可对方全程没有强行拉客，只是耐心引导我操作。
先是让我打开手机里各类打车软件，挨个翻找优惠券。
花小猪、高德打车挨个试，可我早就用过这些平台，新人首单福利、初始优惠早已用完，根本没有可用的低价券。
翻遍所有 APP。
最后只剩下滴滴打车，对方一看就说这个账号一个月内没使用过，刚好能激活沉默用户优惠券。
一番操作下来，叠加平台补贴后，这一单最低也要四块钱。
我本打算作罢，没想到对方直接微信转了我两块钱，让我支付四块钱车费。
相当于我自掏腰包只花了两块钱，顺利打上正规滴滴快车，平安到了地铁站。
全程没有任何套路，没有额外收费，没有索要个人信息。
没有让下载陌生软件，就这么真真切切花两块钱完成了行程。
可疑惑也随之而来，这些拉客的人到底图什么？平白无故自己掏两块钱补贴我，做亏本买卖吗？显然不可能。
深究之后，才摸清这条隐藏在景区、车站、大型场馆周边的网约车地推产业链。
以及背后的资本逻辑。
首先要明确的是，这些人不是出租车司机，也不是黑车拉客仔，而是网约车平台的线下地推人员。
业内俗称摇儿客，他们的收入从来不是赚乘客的车费，而是赚平台的推广奖励，这是整个逻辑的核心。
当下各大网约车平台。
都会给线下地推制定高额的拉新用户召回奖励。
针对从未注册使用的新用户，地推成功完成首单，能拿到15~30元不等的单人奖励。
而针对像我这样一个月甚至更长时间没有下单的沉默用户。
沉睡用户成功激活下单，奖励也在15~25元左右。
这个奖励金额远高于他们补贴给我的两块钱。
他们做的就是用极低的成本。
完成平台的用户考核指标。
我花两块钱是占便宜，地推人员付出2元成本，却能从平台拿走十几块的奖励。
扣除补贴，每单净赚13~23元。
稳赚不赔。
而他们扎堆在博物馆、景区、车站这类人流密集地，就是因为这里游客多，外来人员多，新用户和沉默用户占比高。
推广转化率远超其他地方。
至于为什么要挨个帮我找优惠券，哪怕自己贴钱也要促成订单，本质是为了降低用户的戒备心和付费门槛。
提高成单率。
游客心里对低价有预期，两块钱刚好符合大众心理。
一旦报价过高，绝大多数人会直接拒绝，地推人员就拿不到平台奖励。
只有快速促成下单，他们才能高效赚奖励。
一天下来推个几十单，收入十分可观。
而这一现象的根源，直指当下互联网行业最典型的资本烧钱模式。
也是中国互联网行业独有的行业内卷现状。
网约车平台之所以愿意拿出高额补贴做德推，根本不是做慈善，而是为了做漂亮数据，争夺融资与上市资格。
如今网约车市场早已饱和，滴滴占据绝大多数市场份额。
T 三、曹操、高德等二线平台想要生存，只能拼命冲数据。
日活用户 D A U 月活用户 M A U。
订单量、用户召回率、市场占有率，这些是投资人、资本市场最看重的指标，数据好看就能抬高公司估值。
顺利拿到下一轮风险投资，哪怕长期亏损，也能靠融资续命。
若是数据下滑，就意味着失去资本青睐，直接面临出局的风险。
对于筹备上市的平台而言，漂亮的日活跃、月活跃数据，更是上市招股书中最核心的故事，直接决定上市市值和融资规模。
说白了，平台烧钱做补贴，养着地推团队，就是用真金白银买流量数据，用数据换取资本信任。
地推人员补贴的两块钱，对平台来说。
就是获取一个活跃用户的获客成本。
只要这个成本低于资本给出的估值，平台就会一直做。
这种行为算不上法律意义上的欺诈。
用户确实享受到了低价出行，地推合规赚取推广费，平台也完成了数据指标，看似三方共赢，但本质是用补贴制造虚假活跃。
美化运营数据，变相向资本传递虚假的行业热度，属于行业内心照不宣的灰色操作。
放眼整个中国互联网，这种烧钱换流量、用数据换资本的模式早已屡见不鲜。
早年网约车大战，滴滴、快的、 Uber 中国烧掉数百亿。
外卖大战、社区团购大战，无一不是靠疯狂补贴抢占市场。
先靠资本输血，卷死对手，形成行业垄断后，再停止补贴，提高价格，提升抽成，最终把前期烧的钱从用户和商家身上赚回来。
前期是投资人买单，后期终究是普通用户和从业者买单。
而我们这些偶然遇到低价补贴的乘客，不过是这场资本游戏里。
被用来刷数据的工具人，占的那点小便宜，不过是资本烧钱过程中散落的零星碎片。
最后也给大家提个醒，遇到这类线下打车的推。
只要是在自己手机上操作，不提供验证码，不透露身份证，不下载陌生 APP 不参与刷单充值，单纯低价打车。
一般没有风险。
但一旦对方要求授权个人信息、转账、刷单，一定要立刻拒绝，切莫因小失大。
这场2元打车的奇遇。
看似是生活里的小事，却照见了互联网行业最真实的生存法则。
没有无缘无故的亏本，所有看似不合常理的低价背后。
都藏着环环相扣的商业逻辑和资本逐利的底层真相。
外行人看懂了这些，以后再遇到类似的事，也就不会满心疑惑，更能轻易避开潜在的陷阱。

修正脚本

江西博物馆2元打车奇遇，揭秘网约车地下地推链，看懂互联网烧钱真相。
上周在江西博物馆，我经历了一件至今回想起来都觉得不可思议的事。
也彻底看清了当下网约车行业，乃至整个中国互联网圈藏在流量背后的残酷商业逻辑。
原本以为是骗局，最后全程安全落地。
可越琢磨越觉得，这看似占便宜的小事，实则是一场资本、地推、普通用户三方交织的精准博弈。
今天把完整经历和背后深层逻辑全部分享给大家。
帮外行人一眼看透门道。
从江西博物馆参观结束后，我打算前往地铁站。
刚走到馆门口，就被一群看似拉客的人围了上来。
不同于寻常黑车拉客，他们开口就说两块钱帮你打正规出租车、网约车到地铁站。
第一反应就是难以置信，甚至满心警惕。
这段路程虽说不远，大概一公里左右。
可就算是摩的、三轮车，两块钱也根本不可能。
更何况是正规出租车、网约车。
正常打车即便起步价也远不止这个数。
摆明了不符合常理，任谁都会觉得是骗局，要么是中途加价，要么是诱导消费。
可对方全程没有强行拉客，只是耐心引导我操作。
先是让我打开手机里各类打车软件，挨个翻找优惠券。
花小猪、高德打车挨个试，可我早就用过这些平台，新人首单福利、初始优惠早已用完，根本没有可用的低价券。
翻遍所有 APP。
最后只剩下滴滴打车，对方一看就说这个账号一个月内没使用过，刚好能激活沉默用户优惠券。
一番操作下来，叠加平台补贴后，这一单最低也要四块钱。
我本打算作罢，没想到对方直接微信转了我两块钱，让我支付四块钱车费。
相当于我自掏腰包只花了两块钱，顺利打上正规滴滴快车，平安到了地铁站。
全程没有任何套路，没有额外收费，没有索要个人信息。
没有让下载陌生软件，就这么真真切切花两块钱完成了行程。
可疑惑也随之而来，这些拉客的人到底图什么？平白无故自己掏两块钱补贴我，做亏本买卖吗？显然不可能。
深究之后，才摸清这条隐藏在景区、车站、大型场馆周边的网约车地推产业链。
以及背后的资本逻辑。
首先要明确的是，这些人不是出租车司机，也不是黑车拉客仔，而是网约车平台的线下地推人员。
业内俗称摇儿客，他们的收入从来不是赚乘客的车费，而是赚平台的推广奖励，这是整个逻辑的核心。
当下各大网约车平台。
都会给线下地推制定高额的拉新用户召回奖励。
针对从未注册使用的新用户，地推成功完成首单，能拿到15~30元不等的单人奖励。
而针对像我这样一个月甚至更长时间没有下单的沉默用户。
沉睡用户成功激活下单，奖励也在15~25元左右。
这个奖励金额远高于他们补贴给我的两块钱。
他们做的就是用极低的成本。
完成平台的用户考核指标。
我花两块钱是占便宜，地推人员付出2元成本，却能从平台拿走十几块的奖励。
扣除补贴，每单净赚13~23元。
稳赚不赔。
而他们扎堆在博物馆、景区、车站这类人流密集地，就是因为这里游客多，外来人员多，新用户和沉默用户占比高。
推广转化率远超其他地方。
至于为什么要挨个帮我找优惠券，哪怕自己贴钱也要促成订单，本质是为了降低用户的戒备心和付费门槛。
提高成单率。
游客心里对低价有预期，两块钱刚好符合大众心理。
一旦报价过高，绝大多数人会直接拒绝，地推人员就拿不到平台奖励。
只有快速促成下单，他们才能高效赚奖励。
一天下来推个几十单，收入十分可观。
而这一现象的根源，直指当下互联网行业最典型的资本烧钱模式。
也是中国互联网行业独有的行业内卷现状。
网约车平台之所以愿意拿出高额补贴做地推，根本不是做慈善，而是为了做漂亮数据，争夺融资与上市资格。
如今网约车市场早已饱和，滴滴占据绝大多数市场份额。
T 三、曹操、高德等二线平台想要生存，只能拼命冲数据。
日活用户 D A U 月活用户 M A U。
订单量、用户召回率、市场占有率，这些是投资人、资本市场最看重的指标，数据好看就能抬高公司估值。
顺利拿到下一轮风险投资，哪怕长期亏损，也能靠融资续命。
若是数据下滑，就意味着失去资本青睐，直接面临出局的风险。
对于筹备上市的平台而言，漂亮的日活跃、月活跃数据，更是上市招股书中最核心的故事，直接决定上市市值和融资规模。
说白了，平台烧钱做补贴，养着地推团队，就是用真金白银买流量数据，用数据换取资本信任。
地推人员补贴的两块钱，对平台来说。
就是获取一个活跃用户的获客成本。
只要这个成本低于资本给出的估值，平台就会一直做。
这种行为算不上法律意义上的欺诈。
用户确实享受到了低价出行，地推合规赚取推广费，平台也完成了数据指标，看似三方共赢，但本质是用补贴制造虚假活跃。
美化运营数据，变相向资本传递虚假的行业热度，属于行业内心照不宣的灰色操作。
放眼整个中国互联网，这种烧钱换流量、用数据换资本的模式早已屡见不鲜。
早年网约车大战，滴滴、快的、 Uber 中国烧掉数百亿。
外卖大战、社区团购大战，无一不是靠疯狂补贴抢占市场。
先靠资本输血，卷死对手，形成行业垄断后，再停止补贴，提高价格，提升抽成，最终把前期烧的钱从用户和商家身上赚回来。
前期是投资人买单，后期终究是普通用户和从业者买单。
而我们这些偶然遇到低价补贴的乘客，不过是这场资本游戏里。
被用来刷数据的工具人，占的那点小便宜，不过是资本烧钱过程中散落的零星碎片。
最后也给大家提个醒，遇到这类线下打车推广。
只要是在自己手机上操作，不提供验证码，不透露身份证，不下载陌生 APP 不参与刷单充值，单纯低价打车。
一般没有风险。
但一旦对方要求授权个人信息、转账、刷单，一定要立刻拒绝，切莫因小失大。
这场2元打车的奇遇。
看似是生活里的小事，却照见了互联网行业最真实的生存法则。
没有无缘无故的亏本，所有看似不合常理的低价背后。
都藏着环环相扣的商业逻辑和资本逐利的底层真相。
外行人看懂了这些，以后再遇到类似的事，也就不会满心疑惑，更能轻易避开潜在的陷阱。

英文翻译

Jiangxi Museum 2-Yuan Taxi Adventure: Uncovering the Underground Promotion Chain of Ride-Hailing Apps and Understanding the Truth Behind Internet Money-Burning

Last week at the Jiangxi Museum, I experienced something that still feels unbelievable to me even now.  
It also gave me a clear view of the brutal business logic hidden behind the traffic in today’s ride-hailing industry, and even the entire Chinese internet ecosystem.  
At first, I thought it was a scam, but in the end, the whole process went smoothly and safely.  
Yet the more I think about it, the more I realize that this seemingly trivial matter of getting a bargain is actually a precise game involving capital, ground promotion teams, and ordinary users.  
Today, I’m sharing the full experience and the deeper logic behind it with everyone.  
Let outsiders see the tricks at a glance.

After visiting the Jiangxi Museum, I planned to head to the subway station.  
As soon as I walked out of the museum entrance, a group of people who seemed to be soliciting passengers surrounded me.  
Unlike the usual illegal taxi touts, they said they could help me take a regular taxi or ride-hailing car to the subway station for just two yuan.  
My first reaction was disbelief, even full of caution.  
Although the distance wasn’t far—roughly one kilometer—even a motorcycle or tricycle ride couldn’t cost just two yuan.  
Not to mention a regular taxi or ride-hailing car.  
Even the base fare for a normal ride is far more than that.  
It clearly defies common sense, and anyone would think it’s a scam—either price gouging midway or induced consumption.  
But they didn’t force me at all. They just patiently guided me through the process.  
First, they asked me to open various ride-hailing apps on my phone and search for coupons one by one.  
We tried Huaxiaozhu and Gaode Taxi one after another, but I had already used these platforms, so the new-user first-order benefits and initial discounts were all used up, and there were no low-price coupons available.  
After going through all the apps,  
only Didi Chuxing remained. As soon as they saw it, they said this account hadn’t been used for over a month, which was perfect to activate the dormant user coupon.  
After a series of operations, including platform subsidies, the minimum cost for this ride was still four yuan.  
I was about to give up, but unexpectedly, the person transferred two yuan to me via WeChat, letting me pay the four-yuan fare.  
In the end, I only spent two yuan out of my own pocket, successfully hailed a regular Didi Express, and arrived safely at the subway station.  
There were no tricks, no extra charges, no requests for personal information,  
and no need to download unfamiliar apps. It was just a genuine trip completed for two yuan.

But the question followed: What did these solicitors gain? Why would they willingly give me two yuan out of their own pockets, making a loss? Obviously, that’s impossible.  
After digging deeper, I uncovered the ride-hailing ground promotion industry chain hidden around scenic spots, train stations, and large venues,  
as well as the capital logic behind it.

First, it’s important to understand that these people are not taxi drivers or illegal touts. They are offline ground promoters for ride-hailing platforms.  
In industry slang, they are called "shake-your-head kids." Their income never comes from the passengers’ fares but from the platform’s promotion rewards. This is the core of the whole logic.  
Currently, various ride-hailing platforms  
offer high rewards for offline promotion teams to recruit new users or re-engage dormant ones.  
For new users who have never registered or used the platform, a promoter can earn 15–30 yuan per person after successfully completing their first order.  
For dormant users like me who haven’t placed an order for a month or longer,  
successfully reactivating them to make an order still yields a reward of around 15–25 yuan.  
This reward amount is far higher than the two yuan they subsidized me with.  
What they do is use a very low cost  
to meet the platform’s user performance metrics.  
I saved two yuan and got a bargain. The promoter paid two yuan but could get over ten yuan in rewards from the platform.  
After deducting the subsidy, they net 13–23 yuan per order.  
It’s a sure profit.

And they gather in high-traffic areas like museums, scenic spots, and train stations precisely because there are many tourists and outsiders there, making the proportion of new and dormant users high.  
The conversion rate for promotions is far higher than elsewhere.

As for why they help users search for coupons one by one, even subsidizing their own money to finalize the order, the essence is to lower the user’s guard and payment threshold,  
increasing the order completion rate.  
Tourists have an expectation of low prices, and two yuan fits the public psychology perfectly.  
If the price is quoted too high, most people will directly refuse, and the promoter won’t get the platform reward.  
Only by quickly facilitating an order can they efficiently earn rewards.  
Pushing dozens of orders a day, their income is quite substantial.

The root of this phenomenon points directly to the most typical capital-burning model in today’s internet industry,  
and it’s also a unique form of industry infighting in China’s internet sector.  
Ride-hailing platforms are willing to offer high subsidies for ground promotion not out of charity, but to create impressive data to compete for financing and listing qualifications.  
Nowadays, the ride-hailing market is already saturated, with Didi holding the vast majority of market share.  
Second-tier platforms like T3, Caocao, and Gaode can only survive by desperately boosting data:  
DAU (Daily Active Users), MAU (Monthly Active Users),  
order volume, user recall rate, market share. These are the most important indicators for investors and capital markets. Good data can raise the company’s valuation,  
allowing them to secure the next round of venture capital. Even if they remain loss-making for a long time, they can rely on financing to stay alive.  
If data declines, it means losing capital’s favor, leading directly to the risk of being eliminated.  
For platforms preparing for an IPO, beautiful daily and monthly active user data is the core story in the listing prospectus, directly determining the listing valuation and financing scale.

In short, platforms burn money on subsidies and support ground promotion teams precisely to buy traffic data with real cash, and exchange data for capital trust.  
The two yuan subsidy paid by the ground promoter, for the platform,  
is the customer acquisition cost of obtaining an active user.  
As long as this cost is lower than the valuation given by capital, the platform will keep doing it.

This behavior does not count as fraud in the legal sense.  
Users truly enjoy low-cost rides, promoters legitimately earn promotion fees, and platforms meet their data targets. On the surface, it’s a win-win-win situation. But essentially, it’s using subsidies to create fake activity,  
beautifying operational data, and indirectly passing false industry heat to capital. It’s a gray-area operation tacitly understood within the industry.

Looking at the entire Chinese internet, this model of burning money for traffic and exchanging data for capital is nothing new.  
In the early years of the ride-hailing war, Didi, Kuaidi, and Uber China burned hundreds of billions.  
The food delivery war and community group-buying war were all about seizing market share through crazy subsidies.  
First, rely on capital infusion to squeeze out competitors, form an industry monopoly, then stop subsidies, raise prices, increase commissions, and eventually recoup the money earlier burned from users and merchants.  
In the early stage, investors pay; in the later stage, it’s ultimately ordinary users and industry participants who pay.

And we, the occasional passengers who come across these low-price subsidies, are nothing but tools used to pad data in this capital game.  
The small bargains we grab are just scattered crumbs falling during the money-burning process.

Finally, a heads-up for everyone: if you encounter such offline ride-hailing promotions,  
as long as you operate on your own phone, don’t provide verification codes, don’t disclose your ID number, don’t download unfamiliar apps, and don’t participate in fake orders or recharges—simply getting a cheap ride—  
there’s generally no risk.  
But if the other party asks you to authorize personal information, transfer money, or engage in fake orders, you must refuse immediately. Don’t lose big for a small gain.

This 2-yuan taxi adventure  
seems like a trivial matter in life, but it reflects the most real survival rules of the internet industry.  
There is no loss without reason. Behind all seemingly irrational low prices,  
there are interlocking business logics and the underlying truth of capital chasing profits.  
Once outsiders understand this, they won’t be full of doubts when encountering similar situations in the future, and they can more easily avoid potential traps.