我的征尘是星辰大海。。。
The dirt and dust from my pilgrimage forms oceans of stars...
-------当记忆的篇章变得零碎，当追忆的图片变得模糊，我们只能求助于数字存储的永恒的回忆
作者:黄教授
手机视频列表
盘门与中华门
视频
音频
原始脚本
盘门与中华门两种截然不同的古城防御范式。 苏州盘门与南京中华门同为江南保存完好的古代城门，代表了两套完全不一样的守城思路。 苏州盘门，水陆双重瓮城。 盘门最独一无二之处，是陆路、水路两套防御体系完整成对设置。 陆门分为外陆门、内陆门两道独立城门。 中间隔出一片露天瓮城。 战时先放敌军突破第一道外门，将其引入开阔的瓮城天井，随即落下外门的千斤闸，切断退路。 被困在开阔场地的敌军四面受敌，完全暴露在城墙上的火力之下，也就是典型的瓮中捉鳖。 倘若守军没能在瓮城击溃敌军。 内陆门的千斤闸就是第二道封锁屏障。 水门的布局和陆门完全一致，外水门内水门之间形成水上瓮城，既可以拦截水师战船。 同时兼顾调控运河水位，军事与水利功能合一。 两道闸门分置在瓮城两端，陷阱的核心是开放的维和空间。 南京中华门多闸纵深甬道。 中华门不走开阔为坚的路线，它没有露天瓮城，主体是一条狭长幽深的砖石甬道。 甬道之内连续设置三道千金闸槽，四道城门。 敌军一旦冲入通道，守军可以依次放下闸门，把长长的甬道分割成数个封闭的空间，将进入内部的部队切成数段，分段歼灭。 它的陷阱是封闭狭长的通道，利用狭窄空间消解军队的阵型与机动能力。 简单概括二者的战术差别。 盘门是把敌人放进露天大院围杀，中华门是把敌人拽进狭长走廊里截杀。 两种设计没有高下之分，只是针对不同的地形、不同的作战预想演化而来。
修正脚本
盘门与中华门两种截然不同的古城防御范式。 苏州盘门与南京中华门同为江南保存完好的古代城门，代表了两套完全不一样的守城思路。 苏州盘门，水陆双重瓮城。 盘门最独一无二之处，是陆路、水路两套防御体系完整成对设置。 陆门分为外陆门、内陆门两道独立城门。 中间隔出一片露天瓮城。 战时先放敌军突破第一道外门，将其引入开阔的瓮城天井，随即落下外门的千斤闸，切断退路。 被困在开阔场地的敌军四面受敌，完全暴露在城墙上的火力之下，也就是典型的瓮中捉鳖。 倘若守军没能在瓮城击溃敌军。 内陆门的千斤闸就是第二道封锁屏障。 水门的布局和陆门完全一致，外水门内水门之间形成水上瓮城，既可以拦截水师战船。 同时兼顾调控运河水位，军事与水利功能合一。 两道闸门分置在瓮城两端，陷阱的核心是开放的围合空间。 南京中华门多闸纵深甬道。 中华门不走开阔为坚的路线，它没有露天瓮城，主体是一条狭长幽深的砖石甬道。 甬道之内连续设置三道千斤闸槽，四道城门。 敌军一旦冲入通道，守军可以依次放下闸门，把长长的甬道分割成数个封闭的空间，将进入内部的部队切成数段，分段歼灭。 它的陷阱是封闭狭长的通道，利用狭窄空间消解军队的阵型与机动能力。 简单概括二者的战术差别。 盘门是把敌人放进露天大院围杀，中华门是把敌人拽进狭长走廊里截杀。 两种设计没有高下之分，只是针对不同的地形、不同的作战预想演化而来。
英文翻译
Panmen and Zhonghua Gate are two distinctly different ancient city defense paradigms. Both Suzhou Panmen and Nanjing Zhonghua Gate are well-preserved ancient city gates in Jiangnan, representing two entirely different city defense concepts. Suzhou Panmen is a dual water-land barbican. The most unique feature of Panmen is that the complete land defense system and water defense system are set up in pairs. The land gate is divided into two independent gates: the outer land gate and the inner land gate. An open-air barbican is enclosed between the two gates. In wartime, the garrison will first let the enemy break through the first outer gate, lure them into the open courtyard of the barbican, then immediately lower the thousand-jin counterweight gate of the outer gate to cut off their retreat. The enemy trapped in the open area is under attack from all sides and fully exposed to the firepower from the city wall, which is the typical tactic of catching turtles in a jar. If the garrison fails to defeat the enemy in the barbican, the thousand-jin gate of the inner land gate serves as the second blockade barrier. The layout of the water gate is exactly the same as that of the land gate. A water-based barbican is formed between the outer water gate and the inner water gate, which can not only intercept enemy naval warships, but also regulate the water level of the canal, integrating military and water conservancy functions. Two gates are placed at the two ends of the barbican, and the core of the trap is an open enclosed space. Nanjing Zhonghua Gate adopts a design of multiple gates and a deep longitudinal corridor. Zhonghua Gate does not take the approach of building solid defense around open space. It has no open-air barbican, and its main body is a long, narrow and deep brick-stone corridor. Three thousand-jin gate slots and four city gates are arranged consecutively inside the corridor. Once the enemy rushes into the passage, the garrison can lower the gates one after another, divide the long corridor into several closed spaces, cut the invading troops into several segments and annihilate them section by section. Its trap is a closed and narrow passage, which uses the narrow space to disrupt the army's formation and weaken its maneuverability. To briefly summarize the tactical difference between the two: Panmen lures the enemy into an open courtyard to encircle and kill them, while Zhonghua Gate draws the enemy into a narrow corridor to intercept and kill them. Neither design is superior to the other. They just evolved according to different terrains and different combat expectations.
back to top