我的征尘是星辰大海。。。
The dirt and dust from my pilgrimage forms oceans of stars...
-------当记忆的篇章变得零碎,当追忆的图片变得模糊,我们只能求助于数字存储的永恒的回忆
作者:黄教授
手机视频列表
祀戎与国运
视频
音频
原始脚本
四、融与国运,于京华文脉中悟盛衰之理。 初到北京,这座首善之都始终让我心怀敬畏。 此番走访历史研究院。 遍观各地文博现状,再结合多年对家国历史的思索,我终于读懂了国之大事,再祀与戎,跨越千年的深层真谛。 这从来不是单一的家国警示。 而是国运盛衰与祀戎二者互为表里,辩证共生的永恒真理。 国力强弱决定祀与戎的兴衰,而祀与戎的存续又直接关乎国家的生死存亡。 古人所言,国之大事,在祀与戎。 于今依旧是颠扑不破的道理。 戎是国家的筋骨,是国防稳固、抵御外侮的底气。 是国家立于世界丛林的根本保障。 四是民族的魂魄,是守护历史文脉、传承民族根脉、铭记我们是谁、从何而来的核心载体。 二者从来都与国运国力紧紧捆绑,一荣俱荣,一损俱损。 回望过往,国力孱弱,国脉衰微的岁月,便是丝废绒间满目疮痍的惨痛过往。 上世纪八九十年代,国家尚处复兴之初,国力极度拮据,内有发展之艰,外有主权威胁,十年边境战事。 96年台海导弹危机,99年驻南联盟大使馆被炸,每一件都是融资层面的严峻考验。 彼时国家在国防安全上举步维艰。 拼尽全力守护家国主权,却终究受限于国力,难以周全。 而四肢层面,更是令人痛心的文脉浩劫。 彼时文物保护毫无国力支撑,乱象丛生。 殷商王陵、殷墟等先祖遗迹被盗掘一空,无数历史遗存毁于一旦,考古研究因无物可依,近乎停滞。 民国孙殿英盗掘皇陵,建国后文革动荡,八九十年代文物盗卖猖獗,无数国宝沦为废品,流失海外。 陕西的文物境遇是这段历史最真实的缩影。 早年国宝仅藏于碑林,场馆简陋,管理缺失,大量文物入馆即失踪。 连完整造册都无法做到。 修建看守所时,若非武警现场守护,两大陶瓮九百余件稀世国宝早已被民工哄抢一空。 即便如此,一筐黄金文物依旧没能保住。 更多镇馆之宝是工作人员从废品站以10元钱抢救,交警路查截获,农民抱着比废铁值钱的心态上交而来。 这些民族无价之宝,竟在国力衰微之时,落得颠沛流离的境地。 后来国家即便下定决心,在90年代经费极度紧张的情况下,拨款修建陕西历史博物馆。 也终究受限于国力,硬件匮乏到连基础空调都无法配备。 盛夏酷暑中,游客参观苦不堪言。 更因场馆空间狭小,海量珍贵文物只能深藏库房,无缘与世人见面,徒留有国宝而无馆展之的无奈。 这便是国运颓势下的必然。 国力不足,既无力强荣誉外,更无力兴四互文。 四与荣双双陷入困境,民族文脉与家国安全都面临前所未有的危机。 而如今国泰民安,国力昌盛,思与容的局面迎来彻底反转,恰恰印证了二者与国力的辩证关系。 容固则国安。 如今国家拥有强大国防实力,彻底摆脱昔日外部威胁,守住家国安宁。 这是一切发展的前提,更是文脉守护的根基。 没有强大的武力保障国家稳定,再珍贵的文物,再厚重的文脉,都可能在动荡中灰飞烟灭。 唯有荣强国安,方能谈文脉传承。 谈文物保护。 国安则四兴,国力强盛,让文物保护与文脉传承有了充足底气与支撑。 国家斥巨资建立历史研究院。 统筹全国精品文物保护与研究。 即便地方博物馆有本位之私,不舍镇馆之宝,但从民族文脉大局看,正是这种国家级统筹,让无数兵流失的国宝得以妥善留存。 避免了昔日悲剧。 全国各地博物馆如雨后春笋拔地而起,即便漳州这样的小城,都建起设施完善的博物馆。 有人说硬件略有超前,但这远胜于昔日有国宝无场馆的窘迫。 场馆先行,保护到位,才是对民族文脉最负责的守护。 昔日陕博连空调都无力配备。 文物藏于库房,难见天日。 如今各地博物馆设施精良,文物得到专业修复与妥善展览。 昔日文物被盗抢,沦为废品。 如今有完善法律、专业团队、充足经费守护每一件历史遗存。 这是国力昌盛最直观的体现,也是四支兴盛的最好证明。 谈及此间心境,恰如红楼梦中那则经典谜语,相喜亦喜,相忧亦忧。 这里的相是人字旁的相。 通巷,亦如镜中影像,如实映照世事变迁,也藏着寻常国人的家国情怀。 镜子里映出盛世欢颜,便由衷欢喜。 镜中照出国运颓势便满心沉痛,这便是位卑未敢忘忧国的赤诚。 不是身居高位的宏大叙事,而是一个普通人对家国兴衰的本能共情。 看到国家如今筑牢国防根基,力护文脉传承。 看文物在恒温恒湿场馆中安然陈列,看各地博物馆成为文明纽带。 心中满是欣慰与振奋。 这份欢喜不是空泛歌颂,而是源于对历史劫难的痛惜,对当下盛世的珍视。 我们庆幸生于盛世。 庆幸国家有足够国力强荣安国,兴嗣互文,更明白这份安宁与传承来之不易。 红楼梦那则谜语的镜中影像,正是国之兴衰的写照。 国力衰微,荣难御敌。 四难互文,家国与文脉双双陷入危局。 国力强盛,以荣安国,以国力兴寺,文物得以留存,文脉得以传承。 民族根脉得以铭记。 强荣是兴寺的前提,兴寺是强国的彰显,二者相辅相成,缺一不可。 此番北京之行。 看历史研究院的文脉担当,看全国文博事业的蓬勃发展。 再对比昔日文脉浩劫,我愈发清晰,从来没有凭空而来的文脉传承。 也没有理所当然的家国安宁,一切都建立在国力强盛之上。 国之大事,在祀在戎,祀与戎的兴盛依托国运昌盛。 反过来,重视思与容,守护文脉,筑牢国防,又能让国家行稳致远。 唯有铭记思与容的家国大义,不忘历史兴衰之理。 方能让民族文脉永续传承,让国家永远屹立于世界民族之林。
修正脚本
四、融入国运,于京华文脉中悟盛衰之理。 初到北京,这座首善之都始终让我心怀敬畏。 此番走访历史研究院。 遍观各地文博现状,再结合多年对家国历史的思索,我终于读懂了国之大事,在祀与戎,跨越千年的深层真谛。 这从来不是单一的家国警示。 而是国运盛衰与祀戎二者互为表里,辩证共生的永恒真理。 国力强弱决定祀与戎的兴衰,而祀与戎的存续又直接关乎国家的生死存亡。 古人所言,国之大事,在祀与戎。 于今依旧是颠扑不破的道理。 戎是国家的筋骨,是国防稳固、抵御外侮的底气。 是国家立于世界丛林的根本保障。 祀是民族的魂魄,是守护历史文脉、传承民族根脉、铭记我们是谁、从何而来的核心载体。 二者从来都与国运国力紧紧捆绑,一荣俱荣,一损俱损。 回望过往,国力孱弱,国脉衰微的岁月,便是祀废戎艰满目疮痍的惨痛过往。 上世纪八九十年代,国家尚处复兴之初,国力极度拮据,内有发展之艰,外有主权威胁,十年边境战事。 96年台海导弹危机,99年驻南联盟大使馆被炸,每一件都是戎事层面的严峻考验。 彼时国家在国防安全上举步维艰。 拼尽全力守护家国主权,却终究受限于国力,难以周全。 而祀事层面,更是令人痛心的文脉浩劫。 彼时文物保护毫无国力支撑,乱象丛生。 殷商王陵、殷墟等先祖遗迹被盗掘一空,无数历史遗存毁于一旦,考古研究因无物可依,近乎停滞。 民国孙殿英盗掘皇陵,建国后文革动荡,八九十年代文物盗卖猖獗,无数国宝沦为废品,流失海外。 陕西的文物境遇是这段历史最真实的缩影。 早年国宝仅藏于碑林,场馆简陋,管理缺失,大量文物入馆即失踪。 连完整造册都无法做到。 修建看守所时,若非武警现场守护,两大陶瓮九百余件稀世国宝早已被民工哄抢一空。 即便如此,一筐黄金文物依旧没能保住。 更多镇馆之宝是工作人员从废品站以10元钱抢救回来,交警路查截获,农民抱着比废铁值钱的心态上交而来。 这些民族无价之宝,竟在国力衰微之时,落得颠沛流离的境地。 后来国家即便下定决心,在90年代经费极度紧张的情况下,拨款修建陕西历史博物馆。 也终究受限于国力,硬件匮乏到连基础空调都无法配备。 盛夏酷暑中,游客参观苦不堪言。 更因场馆空间狭小,海量珍贵文物只能深藏库房,无缘与世人见面,徒留有国宝而无馆可展的无奈。 这便是国运颓势下的必然。 国力不足,既无力强戎御外,更无力兴祀护文。 祀与戎双双陷入困境,民族文脉与家国安全都面临前所未有的危机。 而如今国泰民安,国力昌盛,祀与戎的局面迎来彻底反转,恰恰印证了二者与国力的辩证关系。 戎固则国安。 如今国家拥有强大国防实力,彻底摆脱昔日外部威胁,守住家国安宁。 这是一切发展的前提,更是文脉守护的根基。 没有强大的武力保障国家稳定,再珍贵的文物,再厚重的文脉,都可能在动荡中灰飞烟灭。 唯有戎强国安,方能谈文脉传承。 谈文物保护。 国安则祀兴,国力强盛,让文物保护与文脉传承有了充足底气与支撑。 国家斥巨资建立历史研究院。 统筹全国精品文物保护与研究。 即便地方博物馆有本位之私,不舍镇馆之宝,但从民族文脉大局看,正是这种国家级统筹,让无数流散的国宝得以妥善留存。 避免了昔日悲剧。 全国各地博物馆如雨后春笋拔地而起,即便漳州这样的小城,都建起设施完善的博物馆。 有人说硬件略有超前,但这远胜于昔日有国宝无场馆的窘迫。 场馆先行,保护到位,才是对民族文脉最负责的守护。 昔日陕博连空调都无力配备。 文物藏于库房,难见天日。 如今各地博物馆设施精良,文物得到专业修复与妥善展览。 昔日文物被盗抢,沦为废品。 如今有完善法律、专业团队、充足经费守护每一件历史遗存。 这是国力昌盛最直观的体现,也是祀业兴盛的最好证明。 谈及此间心境,恰如红楼梦中那则经典谜语,相喜亦喜,相忧亦忧。 这里的相是人字旁的相。 通像,亦如镜中影像,如实映照世事变迁,也藏着寻常国人的家国情怀。 镜子里映出盛世欢颜,便由衷欢喜。 镜中照出国运颓势便满心沉痛,这便是位卑未敢忘忧国的赤诚。 不是身居高位的宏大叙事,而是一个普通人对家国兴衰的本能共情。 看到国家如今筑牢国防根基,力护文脉传承。 看文物在恒温恒湿场馆中安然陈列,看各地博物馆成为文明纽带。 心中满是欣慰与振奋。 这份欢喜不是空泛歌颂,而是源于对历史劫难的痛惜,对当下盛世的珍视。 我们庆幸生于盛世。 庆幸国家有足够国力强戎安国,兴祀护文,更明白这份安宁与传承来之不易。 红楼梦那则谜语的镜中影像,正是国之兴衰的写照。 国力衰微,戎难御敌。 祀难护文,家国与文脉双双陷入危局。 国力强盛,以戎安国,以国力兴祀,文物得以留存,文脉得以传承。 民族根脉得以铭记。 强戎是兴祀的前提,兴祀是强国的彰显,二者相辅相成,缺一不可。 此番北京之行。 看历史研究院的文脉担当,看全国文博事业的蓬勃发展。 再对比昔日文脉浩劫,我愈发清晰,从来没有凭空而来的文脉传承。 也没有理所当然的家国安宁,一切都建立在国力强盛之上。 国之大事,在祀在戎,祀与戎的兴盛依托国运昌盛。 反过来,重视祀与戎,守护文脉,筑牢国防,又能让国家行稳致远。 唯有铭记祀与戎的家国大义,不忘历史兴衰之理。 方能让民族文脉永续传承,让国家永远屹立于世界民族之林。
英文翻译
IV. Integrating with National Fortune, Understanding the Cycles of Rise and Fall through Beijing's Cultural Veins. Upon first arriving in Beijing, this foremost capital has always filled me with reverence. This time, I visited the Institute of History. After surveying the current state of museums and cultural heritage across the country, combined with years of reflection on my nation's history, I finally grasped the profound truth behind the ancient saying: "The great affairs of the state lie in sacrificial rites and warfare," a truth that has endured for millennia. This has never been a mere warning for the nation. Rather, it is an eternal truth of dialectical symbiosis between national fortunes and these two pillars—rites and warfare. National strength determines the prosperity or decline of rites and warfare, and their survival directly affects the very existence of the country. What the ancients said—"The great affairs of the state lie in sacrificial rites and warfare"—remains an irrefutable truth today. Warfare is the sinew and bone of the nation, the foundation of stable national defense and resistance against foreign aggression. It is the fundamental guarantee for a country to stand among the nations of the world. Rites are the soul of the nation, the core carrier for preserving historical heritage, passing down ethnic roots, and remembering who we are and where we come from. The two have always been tightly bound to national strength—flourishing together and declining together. Looking back, times of weak national power and declining fortunes were exactly the painful periods of neglected rites and crippled warfare, leaving a landscape of devastation. In the 1980s and 1990s, when the country was just beginning its revival, the national economy was extremely strained—beset by internal development challenges and external threats to sovereignty, including a decade-long border war. The 1996 Taiwan Strait Missile Crisis, the 1999 bombing of the Chinese embassy in Yugoslavia—each was a severe test on the military front. At that time, the nation struggled to ensure its defense and security. It fought with all its might to protect national sovereignty, yet was ultimately constrained by limited national power, unable to cover all fronts. On the cultural front, it was an even more heartbreaking calamity for our heritage. With no national support for cultural relic preservation, chaos reigned. The Royal Tombs of the Shang Dynasty and the Yin Ruins were plundered; countless historical remains were destroyed overnight. Archaeological research ground to a halt for lack of materials. From Sun Dianying's looting of imperial tombs in the Republic era, to the turmoil of the Cultural Revolution after 1949, to rampant theft and smuggling of cultural relics in the 1980s and 1990s—countless national treasures were reduced to scrap or lost overseas. The plight of Shaanxi's cultural relics is the truest microcosm of this history. In earlier years, national treasures were housed only in the Forest of Stone Steles Museum, with poor facilities, lack of management, and large numbers of relics disappearing as soon as they entered the collection. Even a complete inventory was impossible. When building a detention center, were it not for the armed guards on site, two large pottery jars containing over 900 rare national treasures would have been snatched up by laborers. Even so, a basket of gold artifacts could not be saved. Many of the museum's most precious items were rescued from scrap stations by staff for just 10 yuan, intercepted by traffic police on roadside checks, or handed in by farmers thinking they were worth more than scrap iron. These priceless national treasures, in times of national weakness, suffered a fate of displacement and hardship. Later, even when the nation made up its mind—under extreme financial constraints in the 1990s—to allocate funds for the Shaanxi History Museum, it was still limited by national capacity. The hardware was so lacking that even basic air conditioning could not be installed. In the sweltering summer heat, visitors suffered greatly. Moreover, due to the small exhibition space, a vast number of precious cultural relics could only be stored in the warehouse, never seen by the public—a helpless situation of having national treasures but no place to display them. This was the inevitable consequence of a declining national fortune. When national strength is insufficient, one can neither strengthen the military to repel foreign threats nor promote rites to protect cultural heritage. Both rites and warfare fell into difficulty, and both national cultural heritage and security faced unprecedented crises. Now, with the nation peaceful and prosperous, national power flourishing, the situation of rites and warfare has completely reversed—precisely confirming their dialectical relationship with national strength. When warfare is strong, the nation is secure. Today, the country possesses powerful national defense capabilities, fully shedding past external threats and safeguarding national peace. This is the prerequisite for all development and the foundation for protecting cultural heritage. Without strong military power ensuring national stability, no matter how precious the artifacts or how deep the cultural veins, they could be annihilated in chaos. Only with strong warfare and national security can we talk about cultural transmission and cultural relic protection. When the nation is secure, rites flourish. Strong national power provides ample confidence and support for cultural relic preservation and heritage transmission. The state has invested heavily in establishing the Institute of History. It coordinates the protection and research of the finest cultural relics nationwide. Even if local museums are parochial and reluctant to part with their treasures, from the perspective of the nation's overall cultural heritage, it is this national-level coordination that has allowed countless scattered national treasures to be properly preserved— preventing the tragedies of the past. Museums have sprung up across the country like mushrooms after rain. Even a small city like Zhangzhou has built a well-equipped museum. Some say the facilities are slightly ahead of their time, but that is far better than the past embarrassment of having treasures but no place to exhibit them. Prioritizing venues and ensuring proper protection is the most responsible way to safeguard our national heritage. In the past, the Shaanxi Museum could not even afford air conditioning. Cultural relics were hidden in storage, rarely seeing the light of day. Today, museums across the country are equipped with excellent facilities, and relics receive professional restoration and proper exhibition. In the past, artifacts were stolen and looted, reduced to scrap. Now, comprehensive laws, professional teams, and sufficient funds protect every historical remnant. This is the most vivid manifestation of national prosperity and the best proof of a thriving cultural sector. Speaking of my feelings at this moment, it is just like the classic riddle in *Dream of the Red Chamber*: "Rejoice when the other rejoices; grieve when the other grieves." The character *相* here has the radical *亻* standing for person, and it is a homophone for *像* (image), like a reflection in a mirror, truthfully reflecting the changes of the world, and also harboring the patriotic sentiments of ordinary Chinese. When the mirror shows a prosperous time, one feels genuine joy. When it reflects a declining national fortune, one is filled with deep sorrow. This is the sincere feeling of "though in humble position, never forgetting concern for the country." It is not a grand narrative from high office, but an instinctive empathy of an ordinary person for the rise and fall of the nation. Seeing how the country today has solidified its defense foundation and strives to protect its cultural heritage, how cultural relics are securely displayed in climate-controlled venues, how museums everywhere have become bonds of civilization, my heart is filled with comfort and inspiration. This joy is not empty praise, but stems from grief over historical catastrophes and appreciation for the present prosperous era. We are fortunate to have been born in a time of prosperity. We are fortunate that the nation has sufficient power to strengthen its military and secure the country, to promote rites and protect culture. And we understand deeply that this peace and heritage have not come easily. The mirror image in the *Dream of the Red Chamber* riddle is precisely a portrayal of the nation's rise and fall. When national power is weak, warfare cannot repel enemies, rites cannot protect culture, and both the nation and its heritage fall into crisis. When national power is strong, warfare secures the nation, and national strength promotes rites so that artifacts are preserved and heritage transmitted, and the roots of the nation are remembered. Strengthening warfare is the prerequisite for promoting rites; promoting rites is the manifestation of a strong nation. The two complement each other—neither is dispensable. This trip to Beijing, observing the Institute of History's commitment to cultural heritage and the flourishing development of national museum work, and comparing it to the past calamities of our cultural veins, has made me increasingly clear: there has never been a cultural heritage that came out of nowhere, nor has there ever been national peace and security that were simply granted. Everything is built on the foundation of strong national power. "The great affairs of the state lie in sacrificial rites and warfare." The prosperity of rites and warfare relies on the flourishing of national fortune. Conversely, paying attention to rites and warfare, protecting cultural heritage, and strengthening national defense can enable the country to move forward steadily and far. Only by remembering the great national significance of rites and warfare, and never forgetting the principles of historical rise and fall, can we ensure the eternal transmission of our national cultural heritage and the perpetual standing of our nation among the world's family of nations.
back to top