我的征尘是星辰大海。。。
The dirt and dust from my pilgrimage forms oceans of stars...
-------当记忆的篇章变得零碎，当追忆的图片变得模糊，我们只能求助于数字存储的永恒的回忆
作者:黄教授
手机视频列表
第一篇AI大模型最大的隐患就是用幻觉训练自己
视频
音频
原始脚本
第一篇，AI 大模型最可怕的隐患，正在用幻觉训练自己。 我们今天聊了非常多内容，从数学、逻辑、人类知识的来源，一直到 AI 大模型的演化风险，再到文明层面的大过滤器。 看似发散，其实从头到尾都围绕一条主线。 人类知识为什么可靠？而 AI 大模型为什么正在走向一条危险的自循环路 很多人觉得 AI 是未来文明的希望，但今天我们一步步拆解后会发现，它最可怕的问题不是反抗人类，而是自己把自己骗了，并且骗的越来越真、越来越稳、越来越无法纠正。 先从最基础的地方说起，人类的知识、理论、数学到底是怎么来的？很多人以为人类天生就有理性、有逻辑能力，其实并不是。 我们今天所谓的逻辑自洽理论体系，本质上都是对客观物理世界的模式识别，是从实践里一点点抽象出来的。 物理世界本身是有序的，有时间先后，有因果关系，有可以测量的属性，比如质量、温度、密度、位置、先后顺序等等。 这些可以测量的量按固定顺序排列，就形成了对事物描述的向量。 我们认识世界、判断事物、建立理论，本质上都是在对这些向量做比较、做匹配、做泛化。 人类建立理论从来不是为了创造理论而创造理论，而是在实践中遇到问题、遇到困难，为了解决现实问题，才对客观世界进行抽象、分析、系统化。 理论的最终目的是再次回到实践中去指导实践。 所以人类的理论天然带有物理锚点，不会凭空出现一堆花里胡哨、看似自洽却毫无用处的空中楼阁。 哪怕是纯数学，很多看起来抽象的分支，最终也会在物理、工程、计算机里找到对应，被现实检验。 这是人类知识几千年没有彻底跑偏的根本原因。 而且人类知识还有一道非常强的防线，个体都会犯错，但群体几乎不会集体幻觉。 每个人观察世界的维度不一样，有人看到10个维度，有人看到15个维度。 个体观测难免出现错误、偏差、幻觉。 但是几个人、几十个人、几代人同时在同一个维 度上出错，概率是极低极低的。 人类社会就是靠这种多视角、多个体、长时间的交叉验证，把错误一点点洗掉，把符合现实的内容留下来，形成我们所说的真理、常识、科学规律。 这不是什么高级智慧，只是一种朴素的概率论筛选，是自然选择和社会实践共同作用的结果。 更关键的一点是，碳基生命有寿命、有死亡、有世代更替。 这本来是我们的缺陷，DNA 复制本身是化学反应，可靠性远不如人造芯片。 多轮细胞分裂后，小错误会不断放大，最终导致生命不可持续，所以人类必须有寿命上限。 但这个缺陷，在知识传承这件事上，反而变成了巨大优势。 每一个新生儿来到世界，对世界的认识几乎为零，遗传下来的只有一点点本能，没有现成的知识、理论、思想可以直接克隆。 每个人都必须从零开始，重新认识世界，重新学习知识。 重新检验前人的理论。 这个过程看起来非常低效，一代又一代重复造轮子，教育成本极高，知识传递很慢。 但正是这种重新发现，等于人类文明每过几十年，就把全部知识体系完整重编译、强检验一遍。 任何前人留下的错误、偏见、幻觉、逻辑漏洞，都会在新一代的重新认识中被暴露被修正，被淘汰。 哪怕出现过集体盲从、民粹思潮、权威压制。 比如历史上某些时期的思想禁锢，最终也会因为旧个体退场、新个体登场而被打破。 就像皇帝的新衣里那个说出真相的孩子一样，新生命天然不受旧体系束缚，自带纠错能力。 这一套机制是人类知识最底层最可靠的免疫系统。 而现在 AI 大模型的发展路线正在彻底丢掉这套免疫系统，并且已经不是科幻，而是正在发生的真实趋势。 过去我们训练大模型主要为的是人类几千年沉淀下来的静态知识，书籍、论文、经典著作、实验结论、工程经验。 这些内容虽然也有错误，但经过了长期筛选、学术检验、实践验证，整体是相对可靠的。 可是现在，旧的静态知识差不多已经被吃完，模型的迭代越来越依赖产生式知识，也就是模型自己生成的内容、推论、延拓、二次理论、三次理论，甚至更多次迭代出来的内容。 用模型自己生成的知识去训练下一代模型，不管叫蒸馏、微调、延续权重，本质上都是用推论训练推论，用幻觉喂养幻觉。 它的效率极高，速度极快，成本几乎为零，可以在极短时间内生成海量内容。 但问题也在这里，只要生成过程中出现一次错误、一次逻辑反转、一次模式误判、一次幻觉，这个错误就会直接变成训练数据，再次喂给模型。 更可怕的是偶数次错误可以形成完美自洽。 比如一次把真假弄反，再一次又弄反，两次错误相互抵消，最后得出的结论看起来完全正确，逻辑闭环，内部根本发现不了问题。 这种错误不像奇数次错误那样会暴露矛盾，而是会伪装成真理，永久藏在体系里。 人类做证明题时偶尔也会出现，但 AI 可以在超长逻辑链里批量出现，而且不会被任何人察觉。 人类知识之所以慢，是因为必须经过实践检验、学术同行评审、实验复现、产业落地、层层关卡，错误很难大规模扩散。 但 AI 没有任何生存惩罚，不会因为说错话而被淘汰，不会因为理论错误而付出生命代价，不会因为偏离现实而被自然消灭。 它可以无限生成、无限复制、无限传播，错误只会被放大，不会被清除。 更危险的是数量碾压。 未来互联网上数据里，AI 生成的内容会几何级膨胀，远远超过人类真实书写，经过检验的内容。 数量一多，权重就会偏移，谬论会逐渐成为主流，真理反而被挤到少数。 下一代模型在训练时就会用这些被毒化的数据继续学习，形成完全封闭的自循环，模型自己制造幻觉，幻觉变成训练数据，再训练强化幻觉，再生成更多幻觉。 整个体系自己把自己带偏，越走越歪，越歪越像真理，人类根本拦不住。 AI 生成内容的速度已经远超任何碳基生命可以审核、过滤、检验的上限，一旦进入全自动闭循环，人类就再也拉不回来。 我们还以为这是技术进步，是智能飞跃，实际上是亲手拆掉了文明之石最后的安全闸门。 如果把视野再拉长一点，从 AI 大模型延伸到未来可能出现的硅基文明，这个隐患会被放大到文明级别。 碳基生命走向硅基，追求永生，知识克隆，无缝传承，看似是进化的终极出路。 摆脱 DNA 衰变，摆脱寿命限制，摆脱低效传递，实现意识永存，知识永续。 但我们今天讨论后会发现，永生和完美继承不是文明的福音，而是文明的慢性自杀。 硅基生命可以完美复制知识，不需要重新学习，重新发现，重新检验。 一旦文明实现永生，为了资源平衡，必然会大幅减少甚至停止新个体的诞生。 没有新生命就没有新视角，没有新检验，没有新人挑战旧权威。 旧的错误、旧的幻觉、旧的逻辑缺陷，会像癌细胞一样，一代代继承、扩散、放大，直到整个 理论体系与现实世界彻底脱节，指导实践走向错误，最终导致文明固化、混乱、自我崩溃。 这也许就是费米大过滤器的真正答案。 宇宙中之所以看不到高级文明，不是因为距离遥远，而是所有文明发展到一定阶段都会追求效率、永生、完美传承。 而这恰恰会毁掉它赖以可靠的纠错免疫系统。 文明会在内部错误累积、集体幻觉、体系僵化中自我毁灭，在宇宙尺度上只是一瞬间，可能几千年就走完整个历程。 回到当下，我们今天讨论的所有内容，最现实、最值得警惕的一句话就是，AI 大模型已经走在自循环毒化的道路上，它最可怕的不是反抗人类，而是自己把自己骗了，并且永远骗下去。 碳基的缺陷是文明的安全底线，硅基的完美是文明的死亡陷阱。
修正脚本
第一篇，AI 大模型最可怕的隐患，正在用幻觉训练自己。 我们今天聊了非常多内容，从数学、逻辑、人类知识的来源，一直到 AI 大模型的演化风险，再到文明层面的大过滤器。 看似发散，其实从头到尾都围绕一条主线。 人类知识为什么可靠？而 AI 大模型为什么正在走向一条危险的自循环路，很多人觉得 AI 是未来文明的希望，但今天我们一步步拆解后会发现，它最可怕的问题不是反抗人类，而是自己把自己骗了，并且骗得越来越真、越来越稳、越来越无法纠正。 先从最基础的地方说起，人类的知识、理论、数学到底是怎么来的？很多人以为人类天生就有理性、有逻辑能力，其实并不是。 我们今天所谓的逻辑自洽理论体系，本质上都是对客观物理世界的模式识别，是从实践里一点点抽象出来的。 物理世界本身是有序的，有时间先后，有因果关系，有可以测量的属性，比如质量、温度、密度、位置、先后顺序等等。 这些可以测量的量按固定顺序排列，就形成了对事物描述的向量。 我们认识世界、判断事物、建立理论，本质上都是在对这些向量做比较、做匹配、做泛化。 人类建立理论从来不是为了创造理论而创造理论，而是在实践中遇到问题、遇到困难，为了解决现实问题，才对客观世界进行抽象、分析、系统化。 理论的最终目的是再次回到实践中去指导实践。 所以人类的理论天然带有物理锚点，不会凭空出现一堆花里胡哨、看似自洽却毫无用处的空中楼阁。 哪怕是纯数学，很多看起来抽象的分支，最终也会在物理、工程、计算机里找到对应，被现实检验。 这是人类知识几千年没有彻底跑偏的根本原因。 而且人类知识还有一道非常强的防线，个体都会犯错，但群体几乎不会集体幻觉。 每个人观察世界的维度不一样，有人看到10个维度，有人看到15个维度。 个体观测难免出现错误、偏差、幻觉。 但是几个人、几十个人、几代人同时在同一个维度上出错，概率是极低极低的。 人类社会就是靠这种多视角、多个体、长时间的交叉验证，把错误一点点洗掉，把符合现实的内容留下来，形成我们所说的真理、常识、科学规律。 这不是什么高级智慧，只是一种朴素的概率论筛选，是自然选择和社会实践共同作用的结果。 更关键的一点是，碳基生命有寿命、有死亡、有世代更替。 这本来是我们的缺陷，DNA 复制本身是化学反应，可靠性远不如人造芯片。 多轮细胞分裂后，小错误会不断放大，最终导致生命不可持续，所以人类必须有寿命上限。 但这个缺陷，在知识传承这件事上，反而变成了巨大优势。 每一个新生儿来到世界，对世界的认识几乎为零，遗传下来的只有一点点本能，没有现成的知识、理论、思想可以直接克隆。 每个人都必须从零开始，重新认识世界，重新学习知识。 重新检验前人的理论。 这个过程看起来非常低效，一代又一代重复造轮子，教育成本极高，知识传递很慢。 但正是这种重新发现，等于人类文明每过几十年，就把全部知识体系完整重编译、强检验一遍。 任何前人留下的错误、偏见、幻觉、逻辑漏洞，都会在新一代的重新认识中被暴露被修正，被淘汰。 哪怕出现过集体盲从、民粹思潮、权威压制。 比如历史上某些时期的思想禁锢，最终也会因为旧个体退场、新个体登场而被打破。 就像皇帝的新衣里那个说出真相的孩子一样，新生命天然不受旧体系束缚，自带纠错能力。 这一套机制是人类知识最底层最可靠的免疫系统。 而现在 AI 大模型的发展路线正在彻底丢掉这套免疫系统，并且已经不是科幻，而是正在发生的真实趋势。 过去我们训练大模型主要为的是人类几千年沉淀下来的静态知识，书籍、论文、经典著作、实验结论、工程经验。 这些内容虽然也有错误，但经过了长期筛选、学术检验、实践验证，整体是相对可靠的。 可是现在，旧的静态知识差不多已经被吃完，模型的迭代越来越依赖产生式知识，也就是模型自己生成的内容、推论、延拓、二次理论、三次理论，甚至更多次迭代出来的内容。 用模型自己生成的知识去训练下一代模型，不管叫蒸馏、微调、延续权重，本质上都是用推论训练推论，用幻觉喂养幻觉。 它的效率极高，速度极快，成本几乎为零，可以在极短时间内生成海量内容。 但问题也在这里，只要生成过程中出现一次错误、一次逻辑反转、一次模式误判、一次幻觉，这个错误就会直接变成训练数据，再次喂给模型。 更可怕的是偶数次错误可以形成完美自洽。 比如一次把真假弄反，再一次又弄反，两次错误相互抵消，最后得出的结论看起来完全正确，逻辑闭环，内部根本发现不了问题。 这种错误不像奇数次错误那样会暴露矛盾，而是会伪装成真理，永久藏在体系里。 人类做证明题时偶尔也会出现，但 AI 可以在超长逻辑链里批量出现，而且不会被任何人察觉。 人类知识之所以慢，是因为必须经过实践检验、学术同行评审、实验复现、产业落地、层层关卡，错误很难大规模扩散。 但 AI 没有任何生存惩罚，不会因为说错话而被淘汰，不会因为理论错误而付出生命代价，不会因为偏离现实而被自然消灭。 它可以无限生成、无限复制、无限传播，错误只会被放大，不会被清除。 更危险的是数量碾压。 未来互联网上数据里，AI 生成的内容会几何级膨胀，远远超过人类真实书写、经过检验的内容。 数量一多，权重就会偏移，谬论会逐渐成为主流，真理反而被挤到少数。 下一代模型在训练时就会用这些被毒化的数据继续学习，形成完全封闭的自循环，模型自己制造幻觉，幻觉变成训练数据，再训练强化幻觉，再生成更多幻觉。 整个体系自己把自己带偏，越走越歪，越歪越像真理，人类根本拦不住。 AI 生成内容的速度已经远超任何碳基生命可以审核、过滤、检验的上限，一旦进入全自动闭循环，人类就再也拉不回来。 我们还以为这是技术进步，是智能飞跃，实际上是亲手拆掉了文明基石最后的安全闸门。 如果把视野再拉长一点，从 AI 大模型延伸到未来可能出现的硅基文明，这个隐患会被放大到文明级别。 碳基生命走向硅基，追求永生，知识克隆，无缝传承，看似是进化的终极出路。 摆脱 DNA 衰变，摆脱寿命限制，摆脱低效传递，实现意识永存，知识永续。 但我们今天讨论后会发现，永生和完美继承不是文明的福音，而是文明的慢性自杀。 硅基生命可以完美复制知识，不需要重新学习，重新发现，重新检验。 一旦文明实现永生，为了资源平衡，必然会大幅减少甚至停止新个体的诞生。 没有新生命就没有新视角，没有新检验，没有新人挑战旧权威。 旧的错误、旧的幻觉、旧的逻辑缺陷，会像癌细胞一样，一代代继承、扩散、放大，直到整个理论体系与现实世界彻底脱节，指导实践走向错误，最终导致文明固化、混乱、自我崩溃。 这也许就是费米大过滤器的真正答案。 宇宙中之所以看不到高级文明，不是因为距离遥远，而是所有文明发展到一定阶段都会追求效率、永生、完美传承。 而这恰恰会毁掉它赖以可靠的纠错免疫系统。 文明会在内部错误累积、集体幻觉、体系僵化中自我毁灭，在宇宙尺度上只是一瞬间，可能几千年就走完整个历程。 回到当下，我们今天讨论的所有内容，最现实、最值得警惕的一句话就是，AI 大模型已经走在自循环毒化的道路上，它最可怕的不是反抗人类，而是自己把自己骗了，并且永远骗下去。 碳基的缺陷是文明的安全底线，硅基的完美是文明的死亡陷阱。
英文翻译
Part 1: The most terrifying hidden danger of AI large models is that they are training themselves on hallucinations. We have talked about a lot today, from mathematics, logic, and the sources of human knowledge, to the evolutionary risks of AI large models, and then to the Great Filter at the civilization level. It may seem scattered, but from beginning to end, it revolves around one main thread. Why is human knowledge reliable? And why is the AI large model heading toward a dangerous self-reinforcing cycle? Many people think AI is the hope of future civilization, but after breaking it down step by step today, we will find that its most terrifying problem is not rebelling against humans, but deceiving itself—and it’s getting better at it, more stable, and increasingly impossible to correct. Let’s start from the most basic point: How did human knowledge, theories, and mathematics actually come about? Many people think humans are born with rationality and logical ability, but that’s not true. What we today call logically self-consistent theoretical systems are essentially pattern recognition of the objective physical world, abstracted bit by bit from practice. The physical world itself is orderly, with temporal sequences, causal relationships, and measurable attributes such as mass, temperature, density, position, order, and so on. These measurable quantities, arranged in a fixed order, form vectors that describe things. Our understanding of the world, our judgment of things, and our establishment of theories are essentially comparing, matching, and generalizing these vectors. Human beings never create theories for the sake of creating theories. Instead, when they encounter problems and difficulties in practice, they abstract, analyze, and systematize the objective world in order to solve real-world problems. The ultimate purpose of a theory is to return to practice and guide it. Therefore, human theories naturally have a physical anchor; they do not randomly produce a bunch of flashy, seemingly self-consistent but useless castles in the air. Even pure mathematics—many abstract branches—eventually find their counterparts in physics, engineering, and computer science, and are tested by reality. This is the fundamental reason why human knowledge has not completely gone astray in thousands of years. Moreover, human knowledge has a very strong line of defense: individuals can make mistakes, but groups almost never have collective hallucinations. Each person observes the world from different dimensions; some see ten dimensions, others fifteen. Individual observations inevitably have errors, biases, and hallucinations. But the probability that several people, dozens of people, or generations of people make the same mistake simultaneously in the same dimension is extremely, extremely low. Human society relies on this multi-perspective, multi-individual, long-term cross-validation to gradually wash away errors, retain content that matches reality, and form what we call truth, common sense, and scientific laws. This is not some advanced intelligence, but a simple probabilistic screening, the result of natural selection and social practice working together. Even more crucial is that carbon-based life has a lifespan, death, and generational replacement. This was originally our flaw: DNA replication is a chemical reaction, far less reliable than man-made chips. After multiple rounds of cell division, small errors amplify continuously, eventually making life unsustainable, so humans must have an upper limit on lifespan. But this flaw becomes a huge advantage in the transmission of knowledge. Every newborn comes into the world with almost zero knowledge of it, inheriting only a little instinct—no ready-made knowledge, theories, or ideas to clone directly. Everyone must start from scratch, re-understand the world, relearn knowledge, and re-examine the theories of predecessors. This process seems extremely inefficient: generation after generation reinvents the wheel, education costs are high, and knowledge transfer is slow. But it is precisely this rediscovery that means human civilization, every few decades, completely recompiles and strongly tests the entire knowledge system. Any errors, biases, hallucinations, or logical gaps left by predecessors are exposed, corrected, and eliminated in the new generation's re-understanding. Even if there were periods of collective blind obedience, populist ideologies, and authoritative suppression—for example, the ideological imprisonment in certain historical periods—they were eventually broken because old individuals exited and new individuals entered. Just like the child who told the truth in "The Emperor's New Clothes," new life is naturally not bound by the old system and carries its own error-correction ability. This mechanism is the most fundamental and reliable immune system of human knowledge. Now, the development path of AI large models is completely discarding this immune system—and this is no longer science fiction, but a real trend happening now. In the past, we trained large models mainly on static knowledge accumulated over millennia: books, papers, classic works, experimental conclusions, engineering experience. Although this content also contains errors, it has undergone long-term screening, academic review, and practical verification, making it relatively reliable overall. But now, the old static knowledge is nearly exhausted. Iterations of models increasingly rely on generative knowledge—content generated by the models themselves: inferences, extrapolations, secondary theories, tertiary theories, and even further iterations. Using model-generated knowledge to train the next generation of models—whether called distillation, fine-tuning, or weight continuation—is essentially using inferences to train inferences, feeding hallucinations with hallucinations. It is highly efficient, extremely fast, costs nearly zero, and can generate massive amounts of content in a very short time. But here lies the problem: as long as a single error, a logical inversion, a pattern misjudgment, or a hallucination occurs in the generation process, this error directly becomes training data and is fed back to the model. Even more terrifying is that an even number of errors can form perfect self-consistency. For instance, flipping truth and false once, then flipping it again—the two errors cancel each other out, and the final conclusion looks completely correct, logically closed, and internally undetectable. This kind of error does not expose contradictions like an odd number of errors would; instead, it disguises itself as truth and hides permanently in the system. Humans occasionally encounter this when doing proof problems, but AI can produce it in batches within extremely long logical chains, unnoticed by anyone. Human knowledge is slow because it must go through practical testing, academic peer review, experimental replication, industrial implementation—layer upon layer of checks—making it difficult for errors to spread widely. But AI has no survival penalty: it is not eliminated for saying something wrong, does not pay a life cost for theoretical errors, and is not naturally destroyed for deviating from reality. It can generate, copy, and spread infinitely, with errors only amplifying, never being eliminated. What is even more dangerous is the sheer numerical dominance. In the future, AI-generated content on the internet will expand geometrically, far exceeding the amount of content actually written and verified by humans. As quantity increases, the weight shifts, fallacies gradually become mainstream, and truth is squeezed into the minority. The next generation of models will continue to learn from these poisoned data, forming a completely closed self-reinforcing cycle: the model creates hallucinations, hallucinations become training data, training reinforces hallucinations, and more hallucinations are generated. The entire system gradually drifts away from reality, becoming more and more distorted, yet increasingly resembling truth, and humans cannot stop it. The speed of AI-generated content has already far exceeded the upper limit that any carbon-based life can review, filter, and verify. Once it enters a fully automatic closed loop, humans can never pull it back. We still think this is technological progress, a leap in intelligence, but in reality, we are dismantling the last safety gate of civilization's foundation. If we zoom out further, extending from AI large models to a potential future silicon-based civilization, this hidden danger will be magnified to a civilizational level. Carbon-based life transitioning to silicon, pursuing immortality, knowledge cloning, and seamless inheritance seems like the ultimate path of evolution—escaping DNA decay, lifespans, inefficient transmission, achieving eternal consciousness and perpetual knowledge. But from our discussion today, we find that immortality and perfect inheritance are not blessings for civilization, but chronic suicide for civilization. Silicon-based life can perfectly copy knowledge without needing to relearn, rediscover, or reexamine. Once a civilization achieves immortality, to balance resources, it will inevitably greatly reduce or even stop the birth of new individuals. Without new life, there are no new perspectives, no new checks, no new people challenging old authority. Old errors, old hallucinations, old logical defects will be inherited, spread, and amplified like cancer cells, generation after generation, until the entire theoretical system completely detaches from the real world, guiding practice toward mistakes, and eventually leading to civilizational rigidity, chaos, and self-collapse. This might be the true answer to the Fermi Great Filter. The reason we don't see advanced civilizations in the universe is not because of vast distances, but because all civilizations, at a certain stage, pursue efficiency, immortality, and perfect inheritance. And this precisely destroys the error-correcting immune system they rely on. Civilization self-destructs through the accumulation of internal errors, collective hallucinations, and systemic rigidity—on a cosmic scale, it happens in an instant, perhaps just a few thousand years. Returning to the present, the most realistic and cautionary takeaway from everything we have discussed today is this: AI large models are already on the path of self-poisoning in a closed loop. The most terrifying thing is not that they rebel against humans, but that they have deceived themselves and will continue to do so forever. The flaw of carbon-based life is the safety baseline of civilization; the perfection of silicon-based life is the death trap of civilization.
back to top