我的征尘是星辰大海。。。
The dirt and dust from my pilgrimage forms oceans of stars...
-------当记忆的篇章变得零碎，当追忆的图片变得模糊，我们只能求助于数字存储的永恒的回忆
作者:黄教授
手机视频列表
WhenTheGoingIsToughTheToughGetsGoing
视频
音频
原始脚本
When the going is tough the tough get going 这是一句流传已久的英文俚语，道尽了变局之中强者的生存法则。 当处境愈发艰难。 真正有实力的人自会逆势而上。 放眼全球货币格局与产业变迁，这句话同样可以用来解读当下的世界，以及中国与人民币正在经历的蓄力阶段。 历史总是在相似的轨迹中轮回。 如今的中国恰似二战前夕的美国，坐拥全球顶尖工业实力，却尚未站上世界货币舞台的中心。 在平静的表象下默默积蓄力量，静待时代变局的到来。 回溯百年前的世界格局，二战爆发之前，美国早已凭借完整的工业体系。 强大的生产能力跃居全球第一工业大国。 彼时的世界结算体系却依旧被英镑主导，法郎也占据重要席位。 英镑与黄金挂钩，是公认的国际硬通货。 即便美国制造业冠绝全球，美元也没能立刻取代老牌货币的地位。 实力的领先并不等于话语权的及时更迭，旧秩序有着强大的惯性。 唯有一场足以颠覆现有格局的巨大变故，才能撕开固化的壁垒，让蛰伏的强者走向台前。 如今的国际形势与那段历史形成了奇妙的呼应。 中国建成了全球规模最大、品类最齐全的工业体系。 小到日用百货，大到高端装备，几乎能够供给全世界所需的各类工业品。 全球多数国家对华保持贸易逆差，各国离不开中国制造，这是我们实打实的核心竞争力。 但现实是，当下全球贸易金融结算依旧以美元为核心，人民币的国际化之路仍处在蓄力阶段。 长久以来，市场上流传着一种被教条化解读的特里芬难题。 不少人片面认为主权货币想要完成国际化，本国就必须主动转为贸易逆差，效仿当下美国依靠逆差向外输出货币的模式。 可只要梳理美元崛起的完整脉络，就能看清这一论断的谬误。 美元真正奠定世界货币地位，依托的是布雷顿森林体系时代的美国。 彼时美国是全球最大贸易顺差国。 二战摧毁了欧亚各国的工业根基，全世界都需要美国的商品，只能拿出黄金换取美元。 美元凭借商品供给加黄金锚定的双重支撑，成为等同于黄金的硬通货。 大量黄金也在这一阶段源源不断流入美国，造就了其至今无人撼动的黄金储备体量。 贸易逆差只是布雷顿森林体系瓦解，美元脱离黄金束缚后，信用美元维持全球流通的手段，绝非货币国际化的前置条件。 把美元后期的运行特征当成通用公式，本质是脱离历史背景的生搬硬套。 而中国依托制造业形成的贸易顺差，恰恰是货币信用最坚实的底座。 这和二战后美元崛起的底层逻辑高度一致。 产业形态的本质决定了话语权的归属，粮食维系生存是人类的基础保障。 但农业生产门槛相对有限，更多依托自然资源禀赋。 而工业品串联起衣食住行、生产运转、交通通讯等现代社会的方方面面。 技术壁垒、产业链壁垒、规模化壁垒层层叠加，并非短时间内可以复制重建。 现代文明体系之下，失去粮食难以为生。 失去工业品，整个社会运转都会陷入停滞。 手握全球工业品供给的一方，天然就掌握了市场的主动权与议价权。 二战硝烟散去，欧洲大陆诸多工业强国的生产基地沦为废墟，百废待兴之际，全世界的目光都不约而同投向大洋彼岸的美国。 各国倾尽手中的黄金与硬通货，只为换取赖以复苏的商品。 美元也借着这一轮变局，彻底取代英镑，登顶全球货币之巅。 以史为鉴，当下的中国正处在三年不鸣，一鸣惊人的蛰伏期，如同楚庄王潜龙在渊，不急不徐的打磨根基，补齐短板。 机遇永远偏爱有准备的主体。 我们无法预判时代大变局会以何种形式到来，或是经济周期的深度调整，或是全球秩序的重构。 亦或是各类突发事件带来的连锁影响。 但可以确定的是，当现有国际货币体系的弊端不断暴露，信用货币的公信力持续受损，全球市场迎来新一轮震荡时，世界会再度进入刚需主导的卖方市场。 到那时，各国想要获取维系社会运转的工业品，目光必将转向拥有全产业链优势的中国。 当贸易结算不再单一锚定美元、欧元等现有国际货币。 当实物商品与黄金这一千年硬通货重新成为交易的核心纽带，人民币也将迎来属于自己的蜕变时刻。 旧的货币秩序会在风雨中松动。 新的格局顺势而生，被时代大势推向世界舞台中央。 When the going is tough the tough get going 变局从不是灾难的代名词，而是强者突围的契机。 如今的潜心机电全方位布局，都是在为未来的腾飞铺路。 待到风云再起，手握硬核产业实力的中国，终将在全球格局的重塑中一飞冲天。 人民币的国际化之路也将在时代浪潮中踏出全新的轨迹。
修正脚本
When the going is tough the tough get going 这是一句流传已久的英文俚语，道尽了变局之中强者的生存法则。 当处境愈发艰难。 真正有实力的人自会逆势而上。 放眼全球货币格局与产业变迁，这句话同样可以用来解读当下的世界，以及中国与人民币正在经历的蓄力阶段。 历史总是在相似的轨迹中轮回。 如今的中国恰似二战前夕的美国，坐拥全球顶尖工业实力，却尚未站上世界货币舞台的中心。 在平静的表象下默默积蓄力量，静待时代变局的到来。 回溯百年前的世界格局，二战爆发之前，美国早已凭借完整的工业体系、强大的生产能力跃居全球第一工业大国。 彼时的世界结算体系却依旧被英镑主导，法郎也占据重要席位。 英镑与黄金挂钩，是公认的国际硬通货。 即便美国制造业冠绝全球，美元也没能立刻取代老牌货币的地位。 实力的领先并不等于话语权的及时更迭，旧秩序有着强大的惯性。 唯有一场足以颠覆现有格局的巨大变故，才能撕开固化的壁垒，让蛰伏的强者走向台前。 如今的国际形势与那段历史形成了奇妙的呼应。 中国建成了全球规模最大、品类最齐全的工业体系。 小到日用百货，大到高端装备，几乎能够供给全世界所需的各类工业品。 全球多数国家对华保持贸易逆差，各国离不开中国制造，这是我们实打实的核心竞争力。 但现实是，当下全球贸易金融结算依旧以美元为核心，人民币的国际化之路仍处在蓄力阶段。 长久以来，市场上流传着一种被教条化解读的特里芬难题。 不少人片面认为主权货币想要完成国际化，本国就必须主动转为贸易逆差，效仿当下美国依靠逆差向外输出货币的模式。 可只要梳理美元崛起的完整脉络，就能看清这一论断的谬误。 美元真正奠定世界货币地位，依托的是布雷顿森林体系时代的美国。 彼时美国是全球最大贸易顺差国。 二战摧毁了欧亚各国的工业根基，全世界都需要美国的商品，只能拿出黄金换取美元。 美元凭借商品供给加黄金锚定的双重支撑，成为等同于黄金的硬通货。 大量黄金也在这一阶段源源不断流入美国，造就了其至今无人撼动的黄金储备体量。 贸易逆差只是布雷顿森林体系瓦解，美元脱离黄金束缚后，信用美元维持全球流通的手段，绝非货币国际化的前置条件。 把美元后期的运行特征当成通用公式，本质是脱离历史背景的生搬硬套。 而中国依托制造业形成的贸易顺差，恰恰是货币信用最坚实的底座。 这和二战后美元崛起的底层逻辑高度一致。 产业形态的本质决定了话语权的归属，粮食维系生存是人类的基础保障。 但农业生产门槛相对有限，更多依托自然资源禀赋。 而工业品串联起衣食住行、生产运转、交通通讯等现代社会的方方面面。 技术壁垒、产业链壁垒、规模化壁垒层层叠加，并非短时间内可以复制重建。 现代文明体系之下，失去粮食难以为生。 失去工业品，整个社会运转都会陷入停滞。 手握全球工业品供给的一方，天然就掌握了市场的主动权与议价权。 二战硝烟散去，欧洲大陆诸多工业强国的生产基地沦为废墟，百废待兴之际，全世界的目光都不约而同投向大洋彼岸的美国。 各国倾尽手中的黄金与硬通货，只为换取赖以复苏的商品。 美元也借着这一轮变局，彻底取代英镑，登顶全球货币之巅。 以史为鉴，当下的中国正处在三年不鸣，一鸣惊人的蛰伏期，如同楚庄王潜龙在渊，不急不徐地打磨根基，补齐短板。 机遇永远偏爱有准备的主体。 我们无法预判时代大变局会以何种形式到来，或是经济周期的深度调整，或是全球秩序的重构。 亦或是各类突发事件带来的连锁影响。 但可以确定的是，当现有国际货币体系的弊端不断暴露，信用货币的公信力持续受损，全球市场迎来新一轮震荡时，世界会再度进入刚需主导的卖方市场。 到那时，各国想要获取维系社会运转的工业品，目光必将转向拥有全产业链优势的中国。 当贸易结算不再单一锚定美元、欧元等现有国际货币。 当实物商品与黄金这一千年硬通货重新成为交易的核心纽带，人民币也将迎来属于自己的蜕变时刻。 旧的货币秩序会在风雨中松动。 新的格局顺势而生，被时代大势推向世界舞台中央。 When the going is tough the tough get going 变局从不是灾难的代名词，而是强者突围的契机。 如今的潜心积淀全方位布局，都是在为未来的腾飞铺路。 待到风云再起，手握硬核产业实力的中国，终将在全球格局的重塑中一飞冲天。 人民币的国际化之路也将在时代浪潮中踏出全新的轨迹。
英文翻译
"When the going is tough the tough get going" is a long-standing English slang that encapsulates the survival rule of the strong amidst change. When circumstances become increasingly difficult, those with true strength will rise against the tide. Looking at the global monetary landscape and industrial shifts, this phrase can also be used to interpret the current world, as well as the phase of积蓄 strength that China and the Renminbi are undergoing. History always repeats itself in similar trajectories. Today's China resembles the United States on the eve of World War II, possessing the world's top industrial strength but not yet standing at the center of the global monetary stage. Quietly accumulating power beneath a calm surface, waiting for the arrival of an era of transformation. Looking back a hundred years, before the outbreak of World War II, the United States had already become the world's top industrial power by virtue of its complete industrial system and strong production capacity. Yet the global settlement system at that time was still dominated by the British pound, with the French franc also holding an important position. The pound was pegged to gold and was recognized as an international hard currency. Even though the US manufacturing sector was unparalleled globally, the US dollar did not immediately replace the status of the old currencies. Leadership in strength does not equate to a timely shift in discourse; the old order has strong inertia. Only a major upheaval capable of overturning the existing structure can break through solidified barriers and bring the dormant strong to the forefront. The current international situation forms a curious echo with that period of history. China has built the world's largest and most complete industrial system. From daily necessities to high-end equipment, it can supply almost all kinds of industrial goods needed by the world. Most countries in the world run trade deficits with China, and nations cannot do without "Made in China"—this is our solid core competitiveness. But the reality is that the current global trade and financial settlement is still centered on the US dollar, and the internationalization of the Renminbi is still in a phase of积蓄 strength. For a long time, there has been a dogmatic interpretation of the Triffin Dilemma circulating in the market. Many people one-sidedly believe that for a sovereign currency to internationalize, the country must actively turn itself into a trade deficit, imitating the current US model of relying on deficits to export its currency abroad. However, by sorting out the complete trajectory of the US dollar's rise, one can see the fallacy of this assertion. The US dollar truly established its status as a world currency during the Bretton Woods era in the United States. At that time, the United States was the world's largest trade surplus country. World War II destroyed the industrial foundations of European and Asian countries; the whole world needed American goods and could only exchange gold for US dollars. With the dual support of commodity supply and gold anchoring, the US dollar became a hard currency equivalent to gold. A large amount of gold also flowed continuously into the United States during this period, creating a gold reserve that remains unmatched to this day. Trade deficits were only a means for the credit-based US dollar to maintain global circulation after the collapse of the Bretton Woods system and the dollar's decoupling from gold; they were never a prerequisite for currency internationalization. Taking the later operational characteristics of the US dollar as a universal formula is essentially a rigid application divorced from historical context. China's trade surplus, formed by its manufacturing strength, is precisely the most solid foundation for monetary credit. This is highly consistent with the underlying logic of the US dollar's rise after World War II. The essence of industrial form determines the attribution of discourse power. Food sustains survival, which is the basic guarantee for mankind. But the threshold for agricultural production is relatively limited, relying more on natural resource endowments. Industrial goods, however, connect all aspects of modern society: clothing, food, housing, transportation, production operations, communications, and more. Technical barriers, industrial chain barriers, and scale barriers are layered on top of each other and cannot be replicated or rebuilt in a short time. Under the modern civilization system, losing food makes survival impossible. Losing industrial goods would bring the entire society to a standstill. The party that holds the supply of global industrial goods naturally possesses market initiative and bargaining power. As the smoke of World War II cleared, the production bases of many industrial powers on the European continent were reduced to ruins. Amidst the need for reconstruction, the world's attention turned unanimously to the United States across the Atlantic. Countries exhausted their gold and hard currencies just to exchange for the goods needed for recovery. The US dollar, through this round of transformation, completely replaced the pound and ascended to the pinnacle of global currencies. Learning from history, today's China is in a dormant period of "three years without a sound, one sound that astounds the world," like King Zhuang of Chu lurking in the abyss, patiently honing its foundation and filling its shortcomings. Opportunity always favors the prepared. We cannot predict in what form the great transformation of the era will arrive—whether it be a deep adjustment of the economic cycle, a restructuring of the global order, or the chain effects of various unexpected events. But what is certain is that when the drawbacks of the existing international monetary system are constantly exposed, the credibility of credit-based currencies continues to erode, and global markets experience a new round of turbulence, the world will once again enter a seller's market dominated by rigid demand. At that time, if countries want to obtain industrial goods necessary for societal operation, their eyes will inevitably turn to China, which has the advantage of a complete industrial chain. When trade settlement is no longer solely anchored to existing international currencies like the US dollar and the euro, and when physical goods and gold—the millennium-old hard currency—once again become the core link of transactions, the Renminbi will also usher in its own moment of transformation. The old monetary order will loosen in the storm. A new structure will emerge accordingly, pushed by the tide of the era onto the world stage. "When the going is tough the tough get going." Transformation is never a synonym for disaster, but an opportunity for the strong to break through. Today's quiet accumulation and comprehensive deployment are all paving the way for future takeoff. When the winds and clouds rise again, China, with its solid industrial strength, will ultimately soar to great heights in the reshaping of the global landscape. The path of the Renminbi's internationalization will also carve out a new trajectory in the tide of the times.
back to top